Swedish Municipalities Veto 40% of Near-Shore Wind Farms since 2019

Context

Swedish municipalities have consistently been a crucial stakeholder in the country’s transition to renewable energy. In recent years, the number of wind farms being developed and approved has been on the rise. However, a significant proportion of these projects has been met with resistance from local authorities.

Veto Rate

According to recent data from Svensk Vindenergi, the industry association for onshore and offshore wind in Sweden, approximately 40% of near-shore wind farm projects have been vetoed by municipalities since 2019. This is compared to the 20% veto rate seen in the period between 2014 and 2019.

Reasons for Veto

The reasons for vetoing wind farms are varied, but some of the most common include:

• Aesthetics: Some municipalities have cited concerns over the visual impact of wind turbines on the environment and the community.
• Noise: Residents have reported noise disturbances from the turbines, leading municipalities to reject proposals.
• Environmental Concerns: Some projects have been vetoed due to fears over potential environmental concerns, such as disturbance of marine life or disruption to natural habitats.
• Health Concerns: A small but vocal group of individuals has expressed concerns over potential health implications of living near wind farms.

Impact of Veto Rate

The high veto rate has significant implications for the Swedish energy landscape. It is estimated that the 40% veto rate has resulted in delay or cancellation of approximately 1,000 MW of planned capacity, which is equivalent to the output of around 200,000 Swedish households. This has significant implications for the country’s ability to meet its renewable energy targets.

Reaction from Industry

The industry has responded to the veto rate with disbelief and criticism. The Swedish Wind Power Association has stated that the rate is "excessive" and "unjustified" and has called on municipalities to work more closely with industry stakeholders to address concerns.

Conclusion

The high veto rate of near-shore wind farms by Swedish municipalities since 2019 is a significant challenge for the country’s transition to renewable energy. The main reasons for veto include aesthetics, noise, environmental concerns, and health concerns. The impact of this veto rate is significant, with delays or cancellations of 1,000 MW of planned capacity. The industry has responded with criticism, calling for greater collaboration between municipalities and industry stakeholders.

FAQs

• What is the current rate of veto for near-shore wind farms in Sweden?
  40% of projects have been vetoed since 2019.
• What are the most common reasons for vetoing wind farms?
  Aesthetics, noise, environmental concerns, and health concerns.
• How many megawatts of planned capacity has been delayed or cancelled due to the veto rate?
  1,000 MW, equivalent to the output of around 200,000 Swedish households.
• What is the reaction from the industry to the high veto rate?
  The Swedish Wind Power Association has described the rate as "excessive" and "unjustified" and has called for greater collaboration between municipalities and industry stakeholders.